CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
101
Annual Report 2022 Victrex plc
Significant issues considered by
the Committee in relation to the
financial statements and how
these were addressed continued
The Audit Committee’s work on viability and
going concern is detailed above with the
disclosure included on pages 41 and 43. The
annual impairment review performed on the
Company’s tangible and intangible assets is
also reviewed by the Audit Committee,
including the level of sensitivity analysis
performed, which in the current year
considered the impact of inflation and the
longer-term impact of climate change and
the Company’s ambition to achieve Net Zero
Carbon by 2030 in its own operations. In the
cases of both the carrying value of assets and
going concern, the level of headroom
remained at a level where, even under
sensitivity, reasonable changes to the key
sources of estimation would not cause a
different outcome with the reverse sensitivity
scenario analysis performed considered
beyond plausible. PwC’s report to the
Committee came to the same conclusion.
The classification of costs as exceptional
is inherently a judgemental area and
one where the Audit Committee also
supports the Remuneration Committee in
making an assessment of the treatment of
exceptional costs for executive remuneration
purposes. In the current year the cost of
the new ERP implementation has been
treated as exceptional, in line with the IFRS
Interpretations Committee’s agenda decision
relating to the capitalisation of configuration
and customisation costs in a cloud computing
(Software as a Service, ‘SaaS’) arrangement.
The Audit Committee has assessed this
treatment, considered management’s
rationale and also taken input from PwC in
reaching the conclusion that the treatment as
exceptional was appropriate. The Committee
will continue to monitor this position along
with the level and nature of costs over the
duration of the project, which is expected to
complete in 2024.
The Committee considered the clarity
of disclosure in the Annual Report and
discussed with PwC the consistency of such
treatment with the approach adopted by
other companies.
The areas of inventory valuation and UK
defined benefit pension accounting are areas
of higher audit risk and, accordingly, PwC
were asked to focus on and report to the
Committee on, and the Audit Committee
discussed and assessed, these judgements
and estimates. During the meeting of the
Committee which considered the draft of
the Annual Report, the matters raised by
PwC in their report were discussed with
management, including how such analysis
related to management’s own assessment
and the appropriateness of the form of
disclosure provided by the Company in the
Annual Report. In particular, the Committee
considered the following recurring matters:
u
Valuation of inventory: the Committee
reviews the nature of the costs absorbed
into inventory, the level of production
over which these costs are absorbed, the
variances, including in respect of material
usage and purchase price, between
standard cost and actual cost, and the
reasons for movements in inventory value
period to period. 2022 has seen inflation
across key input costs, primarily raw
materials and energy costs, reach levels
not seen for a long time. Management
has absorbed these additional costs
into inventory to reflect the actual
cost of production. The Committee
has reviewed the increase in inventory
valuation resulting from the increase in
costs, assessing this for reasonableness,
supported by the testing and reporting
provided by PwC. The level of production
over which costs were absorbed is
judgemental with the higher of actual
production and ‘normal’ production to be
used. Production levels in 2022 returned
to pre-COVID-19 levels to a level where
actual production is considered as a
reasonable approximation for ‘normal’,
which had not been the case through
2020 and 2021 when COVID-19 impacted
production requirements. This judgement
was reviewed by the Committee,
with input from PwC, including an
assessment of the level of sensitivity
with the estimation. The basis for and
level of provisioning, including for aged,
obsolete and non-conforming product
which is judgemental or requires a high
degree of estimation, are presented
to the Committee by management.
Management produced analysis showing
the ageing profiles of inventory and
analysed inventory movements over the
past 12 months providing the Committee
with sufficient information to challenge
judgements and reach a conclusion on
the level of provisioning. After discussion
with management, and review of reporting
from PwC, the Committee concluded that
the valuation of inventory and level of
provisioning were reasonable. The impact
of changes in the key areas of estimation
on inventory are included in note 3.
u
UK defined benefit pension
accounting: the valuation of the UK
defined benefit scheme obligation is
dependent on a number of assumptions
that are inherently judgemental or
requirea high level of estimation.
Following the closure of the scheme
on 31 March 2016, judgement on
future salary growth rates ceased,
but judgement over future interest
and inflation rates, together with the
estimation of mortality rates, remain,
with sensitivities of +/-1% having a
material impact on the value of scheme
liabilities and therefore the balance
recognised on the Group balance sheet.
The Audit Committee assesses these
judgements and estimates, based on
reports received from management
and the Group’s actuarial advisors. The
Committee also considered the opinions
made and benchmark provided by PwC.
The current economic environment, with
inflation running at double-digit levels
and interest rates rapidly rising in the run-
up to 30 September 2022, increases the
level of estimation involved, particularly
with the scheme using LDIs to manage
interest rate risk, but the Committee
concluded that the assumptions used and
the resulting valuation were reasonable. It
was also noted by the Committee that
the Company’s approach to funding the
scheme has been stable with a track
record of making voluntary contributions
of approximately £1m each financial year
as the scheme worked towards self-
sufficiency. The sensitivity of the scheme
valuation to interest rate and inflation
assumptions is disclosed in note 17.
To aid the conduct of reviews, the
Committee considers reports from the
Chief Financial Officer and the Finance
Director and also reports from the
external auditors on the outcomes of
their annual audit.
The main features of the Group’s internal
controls and risk management systems are
summarised below:
Risk management systems and
internalcontrols
The Audit Committee has responsibility
forreviewing the risk management systems
and effectiveness of these systems. The
responsibilities and processes in respectof
risk management are described separately
on pages 34 to 40 and page 84. The
Committee receives updates and reports
from the Director of Risk & Compliance on
key activities relating to the Group’s risk
management systems and processes at every
meeting. These are then reported to the
Board, as appropriate. The Group designs
its risk management activities in order to
eliminate risk wherever possible, mitigating
residual risk where practicable to within
tolerance, to achieve its strategic objectives.
The Chief Financial Officer has executive
responsibility for risk management and is
supported in this role by the Director of Risk
& Compliance and his team. The Director
of Risk & Compliance manages a series of
risk management committees across the
business which feed into the Executive Risk
Management Committee formed by the
Executive Directors, the Chief Operating
Officer, the Group HR Director, the General
Counsel & Company Secretary and the
Director of Risk & Compliance.